With my birthday arriving tomorrow, as I contemplate another year at my school, BFA, what better way to face the days ahead than to meditate on Siddhartha:
Dzogchen Ponlop Rinpoche
as the Buddha, as if he were a god. The fact is that he was just a
simple Indian guy, a human being like you and me. We think of him as
some kind of super-genius for having attained complete spiritual
awakening, but in fact his real genius was in showing how any one of us
can attain the same awakening as he did. We describe him as a prince and
a member of the elite royalty of his time, and we think that must have
given him an advantage over us -- but the reality is that most of us
today are probably better off, in material terms, than Siddhartha was.
We talk about his kingdom and so forth, but what the prince Siddhartha
had was really no more than what you might find in any middle-class
American household. He might have had more wives, but you've got more
gadgets, more technologies and comforts and conveniences. Siddhartha
didn't have a refrigerator, and you do. He didn't have WiFi, or a blog,
or Facebook or Twitter. He might have had more houses and land, but
you've got a more comfortable bed than he had. Maybe you even have one
of those new, space-age Tempur-Pedic beds. Think of how much time you
spend in bed, and how important your bed is. I guarantee that Siddhartha
had a worse bed than you have.
The point is, we shouldn't mythologize Siddhartha's life and think that
his spiritual awakening was due to his special circumstances. Most of us
today actually live in conditions very similar to Siddhartha's, in
terms of our material situation.
Siddhartha was a truth seeker, nothing more. He wasn't looking for
religion, as such -- he wasn't particularly interested in religion. He
was searching for the truth. He was looking for a genuine path to
freedom from suffering. Aren't all of us searching for the same thing?
If we look at the life of Siddhartha, we can see that he found the truth
and freedom he was seeking only after he abandoned religious practices.
Isn't that significant? The one who became the Buddha, the "Awakened
One," didn't find enlightenment through religion -- he found it when he
began to leave religion behind.
The Lure of Religious Trappings
A lot of people prefer to think of Buddhism as a religion. It's easy
to see why, when Buddhism abounds with religious trappings: the rituals
and the chants and the golden statues sitting on the shrine. Buddha
himself never wanted to be deified in any kind of icons; at the
beginning, he told his students no icons, no worshiping. But it's said
that he had a very devoted student who kept pestering him, requesting
his permission to make a statue of him, until finally the Buddha gave up
and allowed the first image to be made. And now we have all these
elaborate golden icons that look like they were dug out of an Egyptian
pyramid. It's nice to have these reminders, but we must remember that's
what they are: reminders of something, an example to be followed, not
idols to be worshiped.
If our goal is to turn Buddhism into a religion, that's fine -- in
America we have freedom of speech and the Bill of Rights. We can make
Buddhism into a religion, or a branch of psychology, or a self-help
program, or whatever we want. But if we're looking for enlightenment, we
won't find it through relating to the Buddha as a religious idol. Like
Siddhartha, we'll find real spiritual awakening only when we begin to
leave behind our fixed ideas about religious practice. Seeing the Buddha
as an example and following his example -- recreating, in our own
lives, his pursuit of truth, his courage and his open mind -- that's the
real power of Buddhism beyond religion.
Truth Has No Religion
Siddhartha actually became the Buddha through his failure at
religion. He saw that the ascetic practices he'd been engaged in were
not leading him to true liberation, and so he left them behind. But he
had five colleagues who continued their religious practices of
asceticism, and they regarded Siddhartha as a failure. From their point
of view, he just couldn't hack it, and that's why he gave up. Later,
after he attained enlightenment and became known as the Buddha, they
became his first five disciples; but at the time when he left behind
their religious program, they regarded him as a failure. I find that
very encouraging. As spiritual practitioners, we should be open to being
a failure. We can take heart in the fact that Siddhartha found
enlightenment not through his great success at religious practices, but
through his failures.
As Buddhists, Siddhartha's example is the most important one for us to
follow. He was a great explorer of mind and its limits. He was
open-minded, seeking truth, with no preconceived agenda. He thought,
"Okay, I'll do these religious practices and see if I can find the truth
that way." He did the practices, he didn't find the truth, and so he
left the religion. Like Siddhartha, if we really want spiritual
enlightenment we have to go beyond religiosity. We have to let go of
clinging to preconceived religious forms and ideas and practices.
Religion, if we don't relate to it skillfully, can trap us in another
set of rules. On top of all the ordinary rules we are already stuck with
in this world, we pile on a second set of religious rules. I'm not
saying there is anything bad about religion or rules, but you should be
clear about what you're seeking. Do you want religion and a set of rules
to follow, or do you want truth? Truth has no religion, no culture, no
language, no head or tail. As Gandhi said, "God has no religion." The
truth is just the truth.
If you are interested in "meeting the Buddha" and following his example,
then you should realize that the path the Buddha taught is primarily a
study of your own mind and a system for training your mind. This path is
spiritual, not religious. Its goal is self-knowledge, not salvation;
freedom, not heaven. And it is deeply personal. Without your curiosity
and questions and your open mind, there is no spiritual path, no journey
to be taken, even if you adopt all the forms of the tradition.